The University prides itself in the quality of our teaching and of the learning experience we provide. In our mission for Consolidating Excellence (Strategic Plan 2023-2026). special care is being taken to ensure that students are at the centre of all we do.
Our Quality Assurance policy and Quality Handbook are designed to ensure students are treated fairly and equally and that the University is able to maintain and safeguard the academic standards of all our taught programmes and research degrees.
The Quality Assurance Policy sets out the University’s principles and approach to quality. The purpose of the policy is to support our strategic objectives by continuously enhancing the quality of the student experience while simultaneously safeguarding academic standards and integrity.
Detailed procedures for the implementation of this policy are contained in the Quality Handbook which embodies our academic regulations and a comprehensive set of Codes of Practice.
QAA Global Accreditation
The University is delighted to have achieved global accreditation from the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA), the UK’s independent quality body and a global leader in quality assurance for higher education.
The global accreditation, obtained for a period of five years, is awarded to international institutions which have passed the QAA’s rigorous International Quality Review (IQR), which measures global institutions against international quality assurance standards set out in Part 1 of the Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG).
The nearly three-year process took the form of a thorough review of the University’s governance, learning and teaching, and internal quality assurance procedures.
Quality Handbook 25/26
The University of Gibraltar’s vision is to become an institution of excellence in teaching, learning and research.
Our Quality Handbook sets out the Academic Regulations for taught programmes and research degrees and our Codes of Practice which together enable us to meet academic standards and deliver a high quality education experience.
Explore the Handbook
Section A - Introduction to the Quality Handbook
The Introduction to the Quality Handbook provides guidance on the Codes and Regulations in the Handbook.
Part I of this Introduction explains how to use the Handbook i.e how it is structured, key concepts and terminology.
Part II contains Quick Guides which summarise the key areas covered in each section of the Handbook.
Section B - Academic Governance
Academic Governance refers to the mechanisms for, and process through which, the University ensures that it exercises its degree-awarding powers properly, including transparently, fairly and rigorously. It is therefore the means through which the University ensures that its higher education qualifications are consistent with national and international expectations, comparable with other universities, and are only awarded where students have met the published requirements for the programme and qualification demonstrated through fair, valid and reliable assessments. It is therefore part of the overall governance of the University but focused specifically on its higher education provision through:
the Academic Board as the ‘senior academic authority’ of the University; and
the Academic Board’s two sub-committees with authority on academic matters: Academic Quality and Standards Committee (taught programmes) and Research and Research Degrees Committee (research degrees).
Section C - Taught Programmes
Section C contains the University’s regulations and Codes of Practice that apply to all taught academic programmes. (see Section D for Research degrees).
C1 - Academic Regulations: Taught Programmes
C2 - Approval, Amendment and withdrawal of programmes and modules (taught programmes)
C3 - Recruitment, Selection and Admission (taught programmes)
C4 - Recognition of Prior Learning (taught programmes)
C4 Recognition of Prior Learning
C5 - Placement Learning (taught programmes)
C5 Placement Learning
C6 - Assessment Procedures (taught programmes)
The conduct of examinations which form part of the summative assessment of modules, where those examinations are organised by the University in designated examination rooms.
‘Class-based assessments’ – other forms of summative assessment which are the responsibility of the Programme Co-ordinator or other member of teaching staff.
C7 - Academic Misconduct (taught programmes)
C8 - Fitness to Practise (taught programmes)
C8 Fitness to Practise
C9 - Boards of Examiners (taught programmes)
C9 Boards of Examiners
C10 - External Examiners (taught programmes)
C10 External Examiners
C11 - Academic Appeals (taught programmes)
C11 Academic Appeals
C12 - Programme Monitoring and Review (taught programmes)
C13 - Periodic Developmental Review (taught programmes)
C13 Programme Periodic Development Review
C14 - Observation and Development of Teaching, Learning and Assessment (taught programmes)
C15 - Micro-credentials
Section D - Research Degrees
Section D sets out the regulations and procedures for research degrees including MPhil/PhD by research and PhD by publication. It brings together in ten chapters all aspects of research degree provision, and matters specific to research degrees.
Section E - Information, Advice, Guidance and Support
E1 - Information, Advice, Guidance and Support
E2 - Student Contract - Terms and Conditions
E3 - Student Protection
E4 - Reasonable Adjustments
E5 - Student Code of Conduct and Disciplinary Procedure
Section F - Students as Partners
The University is committed to working with students as partners in monitoring and enhancing their learning experience. This Code explains the opportunities and mechanisms for involving students in its decision-making and thereby helping to achieve these aims.
Section G - Complaints by Students
The University aims to ensure that complaints are resolved, fairly and at the earliest opportunity. The University’s procedures for how to make a complaint and how complaints are handled are explained in this Code.
Section H - Academic Partnerships and Collaborative Provision
This Code defines partnerships according to five levels, indicating the complexity and perceived risk, and sets out approval requirements for each level. The Code is underpinned by a process which emphasises proportionality. It focuses on due diligence and the assessment of the risks and benefits. The Code also covers the monitoring, review and termination of Academic Partnerships.